Why your win rate is lying to you
A 70% win rate can lose money and a 35% win rate can be excellent. Here is the number that actually decides it, and how to read the two together.
Win rate is the first number every trader learns and the last one they should judge themselves on. It is a fact about your trading, but on its own it is almost content-free — you can have a 70% win rate and lose money every month, or a 35% win rate and compound steadily for years.
The reason is simple arithmetic that is easy to state and easy to forget.
The arithmetic
Expectancy — the average dollars you can expect from the next trade — is:
(win rate × average win) − (loss rate × average loss)
Put a 70% win rate into that with an average win of $100 and an average loss of $400 and you get:
(0.70 × 100) − (0.30 × 400) = 70 − 120 = −$50 per trade
Seventy per cent of your trades work. You still lose fifty dollars every time you press the button.
Now the other direction. A 35% win rate, average win $600, average loss $150:
(0.35 × 600) − (0.65 × 150) = 210 − 97.50 = +$112.50 per trade
Two out of three trades fail and the account grows anyway.
The breakeven win rate
For any risk-to-reward ratio there is a win rate below which you lose money. It is:
breakeven win rate = 1 ÷ (1 + R:R)
At 1:1 you need 50%. At 2:1 you need 33.3%. At 3:1 you need 25%. At 0.5:1 — which is what "I move my stop to breakeven and take profit early" usually produces — you need 66.7%.
This is why cutting winners short is so expensive. It does not just reduce your average win; it raises the win rate you need to survive, usually past the point where your strategy can deliver it.
What to look at instead
Read win rate and average win-to-loss ratio as a pair, and read profit factor as the summary of both.
- Profit factor is gross profit divided by gross loss. Above 1.25 is workable. Above 1.5 is a durable edge. Below 1.0 you are paying for the privilege of trading.
- Average R is the same idea in units of risk, which makes it comparable across account sizes and position sizes.
- Expectancy in dollars is what you actually take home per trade.
A journal that shows you win rate alone is showing you a third of the picture.
The uncomfortable corollary
If your win rate is high and your results are not, the problem is almost certainly your exits, not your entries. That is good news: exits are far easier to fix than entries, because they are a rule rather than a judgement.
The specific number to look at is profit capture — how much of the available move on your winners you actually kept. If your winners reach an unrealised $600 on average and you close them at $250, your profit capture is 42%, and no improvement to your entry will fix that.
Find out what this looks like in your own journal
Alpha Ledger computes all of this from your real trades and tells you what each habit is costing you.
Analyse my trades for freeKeep reading
Profit capture is the leak most traders never measure
How much of the available move on your winners do you actually keep? For most traders it is under half, and no better entry will fix it.
Revenge trading has a price, and you can calculate it
"Stop revenge trading" is advice. "$4,519 across 19 trades" is a reason. Here is how to find the number in your own journal.
Trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Alpha Ledger analyses your own trading data for educational purposes and does not provide financial advice.